Court ruling puts Guatemala vote, anti-graft fight in doubt
17 May 2019

AP — A high court ruling barring a crusading former prosecutor’s candidacy has turned Guatemala’s presidential election on its ear less than a month before the vote, and raised concerns about what will happen to years of efforts to fight endemic corruption.

The rejection of Thelma Aldana’s appeal means at least two of the top three candidates according to polls will not appear on the June 16 ballot, and analysts said Thursday the Aldana decision in particular appeared to spring from fears over her zealous prosecutions of corruption in politics and business.

“I think that the deeply entrenched, established powers that be in Guatemala are absolutely terrified of a candidate like Thelma,” said Christine Wade, a political scientist at Washington College in Maryland. “She has a proven record as attorney general of jailing former presidents and vice presidents. … And it’s really difficult to see this constitutional court decision as anything other than politically motivated.”

Aldana’s candidacy was denied Wednesday night on the grounds that she lacked a document accrediting that she didn’t have any outstanding accounts after having been responsible for public funds from her time in office.

Zury Ríos Sosa, the daughter of former dictator Efraín Ríos Montt, had already been ruled ineligible due to a constitutional clause on relatives of former leaders running for president. Mauricio Radford was barred for having an ongoing corruption case against him. And a third candidate, Mario Estrada, is out after he was arrested in the United States and accused of drug trafficking charges.

By Sonia Perez D. and Peter Orsi, AP, 16 May 2019

Read more at the Associated Press

Count this content towards your CPD minutes, by signing up to our CPD Wallet


You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.