What a new US administration could mean for the sanctions landscape
03 Nov 2020

The past 12 months have been characterized by a significant increase in regulator activity. At a time of heightened geopolitical tensions, particularly between the U.S. and China, we’re seeing a surge in new sanctions and trade regulations. In recent months, those tensions have hit the headlines thanks to the ongoing legal battle between Chinese social media giants TikTok and WeChat and the US Commerce Department. And a further 24 Chinese companies were recently added to the Commerce Department’s Entity List for their alleged involvement in advancing Beijing’s territorial claims in the South China Sea.

But it doesn’t stop at economic sanctions: there has been a steady drumbeat of punitive actions taken against China, including new US export controls, visa restrictions on Chinese Communist Party officials and technology company employees, as well as an import ban of certain categories of goods produced by forced labor in Xinjiang.

Under the Donald Trump administration, sanctions and trade regulation have become a tool to further foreign policy goals, which is increasing the burden on compliance officers who must respond to unprecedented levels of new legislation. With the US election fast approaching, the prospect of more change is on the horizon.

The topic of foreign policy has featured prominently on the campaign trail this year; analysis of media coverage in Dow Jones’s global news database Factiva over the past month reveals that mentions of sanctions and trade regulation in trusted sources have nearly doubled compared to the same period during the 2016 campaign. What are the presidential candidates saying about the key regulatory issues? If elected, what could a Joe Biden administration mean for risk and compliance professionals? And how can teams keep ahead of the curve against this backdrop of constant change?

China trade war set to endure

President Trump’s position on China has been consistent throughout his first term: economic sanctions, tariffs and other trade barriers have been introduced to reduce the trade deficit and promote domestic manufacturing. While frictions between China and the US have been long documented, the Covid-19 pandemic appears to have further exacerbated tensions.

Although there was initially some expectation in Beijing that a Biden presidency might end the trade war, he has also taken a strong stance, stating that the US needs to “get tough with China” in an essay for Foreign Affairs. In fact, many experts say that the US path towards China is already set, the only question is how aggressive or multilateral the approach might be.

Biden has accused Trump of turning a “blind eye” to the situation in Hong Kong, and has threatened to take action against China over the Hong Kong national security law if elected. He has also said he would strengthen policy on supporting Tibetan independence. If elected, we could therefore expect to see Biden respond more forcefully on account of perceived human rights issues, and a wave of new sanctions against Chinese officials.

What’s clear is China is a top strategic challenge for both candidates, and whoever wins the Presidential election is likely to maintain a hard line. Compliance officers in all industries must be prepared for the trade war to continue, whatever the outcome in November, and respond quickly to any new regulation that comes into play.

Sanctions relief for Iran

When it comes to Iran, the positions of the two candidates differ greatly. The Trump administration has maintained a hard line against Tehran, withdrawing the US from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018, and consequently re-imposing a raft of sanctions. In September 2020, President Trump attempted to trigger the Iran Deal’s “snapback” mechanism, but this move was rejected by the other member states.

Biden, on the other hand, has said that he wants the US to re-join the nuclear deal with Iran. In a recent op-ed for CNN, the Democrat candidate said that if elected, his government would re-enter the agreement provided that Iran also returns to compliance, which would result in a lifting of secondary sanctions, which have been a source of friction between the US and the European signatories to the JCPOA. However, in the case of a Biden victory, Iran’s government would only have a few months to make progress on lifting sanctions, as President Hassan Rouhani is set to step down next year.

What would this mean for compliance teams? On the surface, a lifting of sanctions seems to reduce the complexity of doing business with Iran. However, Iran would remain a high-risk jurisdiction, especially in light of the expired UN arms embargo, and companies will still want to evaluate the other potential risks against potential gains.

Stronger stance against Russia

US-Russia relations have become increasingly complex under the Trump administration. On the one hand, the US has introduced some of the toughest sanctions in years on key sectors and Russian officials close to President Putin under the Trump Presidency. For example, sanctions over Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014 have not been lifted; President Trump approved the sale of lethal weapons to Ukraine; and just last month, the Treasury Department imposed sanctions on four people linked to Russia for attempting to influence the presidential election.

By Guy Harrison, Regulation Asia, 2 November 2020

Read more at Regulation Asia

RiskScreen: Eliminating Financial Crime with Smart Technology

Advance your CPD minutes for this content, by signing up and using the CPD Wallet